User not found

This user could not be found. They may have deleted their account.

age

view: desktop |

Latest:

View All | Update Your Status

Help / Support | Settings | View or Edit your profile

Update Your Status Your Past Updates Everyone's Updates Status Activity Feed Your Friends' Updates Most Liked Updates Specific Users' Updates Status Settings

View a Status

	lovematureladies

Mon, 11-May-20 8:30 AM (3 years ago)

tip

people who despites we own a verified profile tells us to be fake and their profile isn't verified..you know you are just loser!

	KiwiPic

Sounds about typical really

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

Only the male has verification pics as far as I can see, where are hers?

(3 years ago)

	Fire_brand

I am not insinuating that you are fake but you shouldn't still have the verification since the female pics were added AFTER verification was done

(3 years ago)

TopCat57 likes this

	masterstoy91

Actually they are allowed to post pictures of others as long as they are not identifiable after verification, however the profile was verified before any female pictures were added sp that does

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	masterstoy91

Raise questions in many people's minds

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	GottaBeMe

I had pics with a guy (always same guy) before and after verification and my yellow shield was taken away until I posted verified pics WITH him. Just sayin...

(3 years ago)

Mr_Vein, Artistic, Fire_brand, TopCat57 and clittylicker like this

	Artistic

according to NN, its allowed if no id is shown face/tattoo, but as much other things, dif rules for dif people

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	GottaBeMe

^^^ exactly Arti. Neither of us showed face or tatts...

(3 years ago)

	masterstoy91

Not sure how long ago that was gotta, or how many pictures you had with the person, if the person would have been considered identifiable(face or tattoos) but at one point it was very strict

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	GottaBeMe

I have not viewed this person's pics, but I see verified profiles with multiple various partners in the pics....diff rules abound. 🤷‍♀️

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

Well you/she..looks lovely. Thankyou for posting...

...

(3 years ago)

	GottaBeMe

It was quite a while back toy, but it was quite a big deal to the NN police back then even tho no face or tatts showed.

(3 years ago)

	Artistic

only few weeks ago a newbie was told she couldnt be verified cos she had a bj pic in her gallery

(3 years ago)

	masterstoy91

I get it, some times I think mods should have a test or something to make sure we are doing things the way NN intended, there would be less ambiguity in my opinion

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	Fire_brand

This goes against the entire purpose of getting verified.

(3 years ago)

	masterstoy91

Verification is a great thing but a bit flawed

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	Artistic

i still say face=verified,,,, for all

(3 years ago)

Mr_Vein and EmuLater like this

	masterstoy91

Not sure what you mean art

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

A fully nude face ?

(3 years ago)

	Artistic

easy, to show face you must verify, every face added a new group verification

(3 years ago)

Mr_Vein, MrsTrellis and EmuLater like this

	masterstoy91

Okay that's what I thought you meant, and yeah that would cause so many people to freak out

(3 years ago)

	Artistic

why? no face no verification

(3 years ago)

MrsTrellis and EmuLater like this

	masterstoy91

Well some people myself included won't show face, other who like to post won't verify it would cause issues either way

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe likes this

	Raven2005

I have always disguised my face...

(3 years ago)

	Fire_brand

I think Arti means that if you are going to show faces in pictures you should have to verify. Not that you have to show face to get verified

(3 years ago)

Artistic, GottaBeMe, MrsTrellis, EmuLater and clittylicker like this

	Artistic

Toy you are missing the point,,, no verification with face, no face allowed, thats all , doesnt hinder those not showing face

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe and Raven2005 like this

	masterstoy91

Okay

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

I always hide my face as shown and I’ve been verified but I’ve also got some of my tattoos hoeing and frankly to some they’d be a big give away so maybe some written and easily followed rules should

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Added so no one can be mistaken or foul up easily and if modifications are made to the rules then each verified member should be notified as to these changes etc etc etc

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

Seems quite simple to me, he verified with correct pics so he got his yellow badge, he adds her pics, until she posts similar pics with the right signage, his yellow shield should be revoked.

(3 years ago)

Fire_brand and EmuLater like this

	TopCat57

Otherwise anyone could get verified and after the yellow badge has been awarded, post pics of anyone, including ex's, to not revoke until she verifies makes a mockery of the whole verification process

(3 years ago)

Fire_brand, MrsTrellis and EmuLater like this

	Raven2005

She's lovely. Hes posted himself as well..

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

She...

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

*facepalms*

(3 years ago)

Fire_brand likes this

	maraff

Not like our ravin' to miss the point eh

(3 years ago)

TopCat57 likes this

	exiled3826

So if you put a pic or video before and after of you Being verified then you should have your badge revoked if you’ve another with sumit easily recognised it should be revoked

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Shiiiit I could put up a list of names now of people that should have their badge revoked now

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

He...

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

If Raven was a darts player everyone and thing in the place would have a dart in it expect the board it’s self

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

JJust testing..I seems correct, but just a different way to do it.

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

If missing the point was an olyumpic sport, Raving would have more medals than Michael Phelps...

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

I'm being creative.

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Is that another way of saying special

(3 years ago)

MrsTrellis likes this

	TopCat57

No, you have utterly missed the point of this status and are doing your usual, finding it an excuse to pimp pics.

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Does he work on commission or sumit?

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

No, he works on excessive amounts of ultra strong Lager

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

Are you saying thay a couple have to take pics together to get a yellow badge ?

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

I'll say this slowly....each person in a verified profile must provide the correct pics with NN approved signage, whether together or seperately.

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Would ideally make sense to do that since two people use it etc etc so if their together then it should be a joint effort otherwise what’s the point of the badge in the first place

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Hmmm so he gets paid through commission in larger?

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

ok, I think however.. I think basically verifcation was right.. Lovem.. Nice to see you.

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

Question. If one verified member meets another nonverfied member, end up taking pics but the nonverfied member has their name upon them in new pictures, dose the verified member lose their badge unti

(3 years ago)

	exiled3826

The nonmember berries themselves properly in their own gallery be it shared or on their own and then thusly getting back their badge or is it sumit else that would need to happen?

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

I support the desision to creat a couples title to a account.. There were more problems before.

(3 years ago)

	lennynatural

There's really no monitoring after verification, NN probably doesn't have the resources for that. Simple solution is to just get rid of verification.

(3 years ago)

TopCat57 and cmp304 like this

	TopCat57

Then what? An utterly free for all? There has to be something in place, open to abuse as it is, unless it is a show your credit card/identity card, appear on a cam with your username clearly printed

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

in front of who Nn chooses to watch such vids...

(3 years ago)

	TopCat57

I for one go with my gut feelings as to who is genuine or not, if i think they are not, I ignore them. harsh, but my way of dealing with verification

(3 years ago)

cmp304 likes this

	Raven2005

When I post a butt pic in my butt status in which I'm allowed to, I do try and check thats it's not a male posting it, and the yellow badge is a positive plus.

(3 years ago)

	cmp304

I also follow my instinct as TC said. I still get fooled sometimes but that's life. Lenny is right about limited resources. I am actually suprised the system works as well as it does.

(3 years ago)

lennynatural and TopCat57 like this

	Raven2005

I've noticed that it could be easier.Even just pic for example maybe could be a start.

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

*one

(3 years ago)

	Fire_brand

Verification isn't difficult at all,Raven. In my opinion, because it is so easy there is no reason to not have everyone in the pictures to be verified

(3 years ago)

cmp304, Artistic, Mr_Vein, lip2lip and TopCat57 like this

	Raven2005

Hi Fire

..perhaps it's seems too much of a formal barrier to some. Lots in here don't even post pics for example.

(3 years ago)

	lip2lip

Its a simple rule to follow. U

(3 years ago)

	lip2lip

Understand and don't post some one else's pic if its not yours to do so. I.e you only. Or couples who a verified.......

(3 years ago)

	Raven2005

Any pics posted in here become NN Copyright...Do read the small print.

(3 years ago)

	Fire_brand

There is nothing wrong with boundaries, Raven. They actually create a stronger site.

(3 years ago)

Raven2005 and TopCat57 like this

	AdeleGingerRaine

This is a hard oneout of the 50 pic 39 are his,he doesn't show any tats or face but they are listed as a couple so why not put up pics as a couple.

(3 years ago)

Fire_brand likes this

	TopCat57

Why not, if they are indeed a couple get her to post the same kind of verification pics he has done?

(3 years ago)

Fire_brand and flitterbee like this

	clittylicker

In this case, there are at least 11 pics that do not comply with the rule: "If verified poster is not in the photo, you will be subject to having verification removed."

(3 years ago)

Fire_brand, flitterbee, GottaBeMe and TopCat57 like this

	flitterbee

probably already sayid but if a couple then should be no problem doing verification pics with both in said pics otherwise gold should be taken off until done so

(3 years ago)

GottaBeMe, Fire_brand and TopCat57 like this